Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to byteshawn.dev

ByteShawn - Developer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
qulababbas.com
Qulab Abbas - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
leodeleon.com
Leo De Leon - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
c2tbuilds.com
C2T Builds | Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
niharogale.dev
Portfolio | Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
sujaymantuladhar.com
Sujay Tuladhar | Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
anthonyzhai.com
Anthony Zhai's Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rojascode.com
Fabrício Rojas - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ayham-alaaeddin.com
Web Developer & Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
doshikevin.com
Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
jibunprojects.com
Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ajayliu.com
Ajay Liu - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
cd-developer.com
CD | Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
nipeno.dev
Nipeno — Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
digvijaykadam.com
Digvijay Kadam - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
albaehaki.com
Portfolio | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
blackdevblog.com
Kyle Black - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
rohanakode.dev
Rohan Akode - Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
nikicoding.com
Nikita Molina Arévalo - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.