Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bystan.tech

Stans · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
buildwithdistance.com
Distance
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
julia-wang.dev
Julia L. Wang
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
adikhandelwal.dev
Aditya Khandelwal
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
burakkucuktopal.com
Burak Kucuktopal - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
lucatakpa.com
Luc Atakpa
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
luckenco.com
Constantin Luckenbach
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
hohieu.com
Hieu Ho - AI Researcher & Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
junhoyoon.com
Jun Ho Yoon Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
bziamah.tech
Bless Ziamah | Software Developer & ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
ankitg.me
Ankit Gupta
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
adnan-j.net
Adnan Al Jebreen · Software & AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
anomabebe.tech
Anom Abebe — Backend & ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
acarkaan.com
Kaan Acar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
luksarna.com
Łukasz Sarna
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
akshatdmishra.com
Akshat Mishra | AI &ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
the-centaurus.com
Thore Koritzius | Machine Learning Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
muralidkt.com
Murali Kotharamban
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
sivak.ai
Mirek Sivák — AI Architect & Senior Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.