Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to byrd.digital

Kylan Byrd - Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
junlongk.com
Jun Long - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abey.dev
Abey Thomas - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
hoera.dev
Samuel Höra - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
justincomino.com
Justin Comino - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewflanery.dev
Andrew Flanery - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
abhyuday.dev
Abhyuday | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
eftomi.com
Tamas Fulop Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
justintom.com
Justin Tom | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
musamusa.com
Musa Musa : : Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
mtucholski.com
Michael Tucholski- Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
abhinavcodes.tech
Abhinav Anand | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
adamfroehlich.com
Adam Froehlich | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
tewodrosmekonnen.com
Tewodros Mekonnen | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
0xpuddu.com
Alessandro Porcheddu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ehrnhoefer.com
Martin Ehrnhöfer, Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
8qbit.me
8qBIT | qLabs Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.