Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to bworks.dev

Home — Adam Beauferris · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
moltioverflow.com
Home — Molti Overflow
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
superrabbitlena.com
Home — Matt Mierzwinski
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
obsaased.io
obsaased — AI experiments by Adam Williams
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
heybeaux.dev
heybeaux.dev — Beaux Walton
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ethereum-developer.com
Adam Boudjemaa — AI Agent Systems, CTO, Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
gavindoughtie.com
Home – Gavin Doughtie
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
mackuntu.com
Home | MartinNotes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
itslive.dev
ItsLive — Auto-Changelog from GitHub PRs
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
bdgmal.com
Home -
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
korbonits.com
Alex Korbonits — Alex Korbonits
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
oddsequence.com
Odd Sequence — AI Web3 Research
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andreavitto.com
Andrea Vitto — AI, SaaS & Automation
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
beaconcross.com
Home - Beaconcross
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
dipomdutta.com
Home -
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
modelpulse.dev
ModelPulse — AI API Lifecycle Monitor
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ocoperator.com
OC Operator — AI Experiments
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ricekot.com
Home | Akshath's Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
moikapy.dev
moikapy — AI Engineer x Gamer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.