Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bwmp.dev

bwmp.dev Meow :3 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
alcassab.net
Ahmed's Personal Website
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
egeural.com
Ege Ural | Personal Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andster.dev
andrew's website
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
thanoskolonis.com
Thanos Kolonis
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
kaarlej.com
KaarleJ - portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
thecasualdev.com
The Casual Dev
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
lucianbc.com
Lucian Boaca | Software Developer | Lucian Boaca | Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lucasarden.com
Lucas Arden's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
atomaka.com
Andrew Tomaka
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
sivothayan.com
Sivothayan – Software Developer & CS Undergraduate
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sivothajan.dev
Sivothayan – Software Developer & CS Undergraduate
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ankurlathwal.com
Ankur Lathwal | Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simitmodi.dev
Simit Modi
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pacheco.dev
pacheco.dev - Technical musings
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ashmityerukola.org
Ashmit Yerukola | Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
eguyot.dev
Evan Guyot's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pabloabc.dev
@pabloabc.dev on Bluesky
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
frontend-development.com
Dev Tips
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.