Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bvarner.dev

Brandon Varner · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
juliusgb.com
Julius Baliling
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
oyusif.dev
Oyusif — Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
jramalho.dev
Jonathan Ramalho — React Native
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alexnicholas.dev
Alex Nicholas | Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
akshaybenny.com
Akshay Benny | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
jsolint.com
JSON Validator & Formatter | Free Online JSON Checker
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
simonhearne.com
Simon Hearne
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ozkancimenli.com
Ozkan Cimenli | Full-Stack Developer & Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ozgun.dev
Özgün Çalıkoğlu
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
buddhsentripathi.com
Buddhsen Tripathi
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ed-llorada.dev
Edison Llorada | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
jrodolfo.com
Software Developer - Rod Oliveira
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
juniusl.dev
Junius Lekgoara - Full-stack Developer & DevOps Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
sirunde.com
Sirunde - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
bunoon.com
William Troup - Musician, Developer, Author
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mskog.com
Magnus Skog - Ruby on Rails, self-hosting, performance, learning
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alexswensen.io
Alexander Swensen | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
brunofrigeri.com
Bruno Frigeri
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.