Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buzzconf.org

BuzzConf · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
sigwait.com
It's Your Code!
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
brunoripa.com
What I have to say ... – Bruno Ripa
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
0xfuzzcat.dev
0xfuzzcat blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
caesarverifier.org
Caesar Verifier
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
a-nickels-worth.dev
A Nickel's Worth
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
atomsofconfusion.com
Atoms of Confusion
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
atruedev.com
A True Dev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pacoworks.com
Paco won't stop learning
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
aelspire.info
Aelspire (@aelspire@aelspire.info)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
efebolukbasi.com
Efe Bolukbasi | CS @ QueensU
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
julialopina.com
Julia Lopina
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mshafeeq.com
Home - The Embedded Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andypan.me
Andy Pan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
absolutearray.com
In a quest for vast knowledge
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
bugraeren.com
Bugra Eren — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
lu-pan.com
Lu’s blog | Learnings on system and programming.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
techfortalk.uk 🇬🇧
Tech For Talk – A Tech Site for Software Professionals
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
techfortalk.co.uk 🇬🇧
Tech For Talk – A Tech Site for Software Professionals
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.