Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buttjer.net

Malte Buttjer - Profile · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
hithahere.com
Hitha R - Product designer
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
builtinhyderabad.com
Profile page
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
the-xtech.com
X Technologies — Product Studio & Venture Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
acrefoundry.com
Acre Foundry - Product Development & Tinkering
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
abur.io
Arthur Burnichon - Product Maker
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
4kta.com
Entrepreneur Corner - Home
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
atolye15.com
Atolye15: Trusted Long-Term Product Development Partner
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
6startupstages.com
How non-technical founders create profitable tech startups | The 6 Startup Stages Book
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
simontran.com
Simon Tran – Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
butteredtoast.io
Toast is Never Toast Without Butter | Buttered Toast
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
justinwitz.com
Justin Witz - Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
justinmcho.com
Justin Mingi Cho
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
longroc.com
Superior - Startup & SaaS Template
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
mrbecquet.com
Andrew Becquet - Entrepreneur, Mentor, Racer
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
siliconbeachyp.com
SiliconBeach Young Professionals - Home
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
silvioporcellana.com
Silvio Porcellana | Digital Product Builder & Venture Partner
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
caesarventures.io
About - Caesar Ventures
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
acceleratorpioneer.com
Accelerator Programme - Pioneer Group
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.