Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to busacchi.com

Marco Busacchi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
juliannarhedey.com
MarCom.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
louiepascua.com
louiearthur.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
atechy.org
About Me | Your Name
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lqmode.com
Laura Quintero
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
atharcore.com
AtharCore
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andythrogmorton.com
Andy Throgmorton
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
thatcoolidea.com
Hello - Sam Weaver
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
hiveonboard.com
HIVE Onboard - Learn, Join and Explore the HIVE Blockchain
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
actuallyuseful.org
Actually Useful – Stuff You Want to Know
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
coverguardapp.com
CoverGuard
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mrvaidya.com
Home | Gaurav Vaidya
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
thatmarcel.com
thatmarcel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juanluismarcos.com
Juan Marcos | DevOps Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mrdeeppatel.com
Deep Patel – Data Enthusiast
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
silasarentsen.com
Silas Arentsen - Official Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
acroainc.org
Acro Business Solutions - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anirudhsanjeev.org
Ani Sanjeev
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
360indepth.com
360indepth
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.