Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to burnt-studio.com

Home - burnt · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
newexist.de 🇩🇪
Home - NEWEXIST
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
aplusb.biz
Home | Deutsch
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
onespark.de 🇩🇪
Home
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
aachen.digital
Startseite - digitalHUB Aachen
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
achtung-achterbahn.com
Achtung Achterbahn - Business & Freunde Talk - Podcast
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
netzwerk-der-wissenschaft.de 🇩🇪
Home / Netzwerk der Wissenschaft Wiesbaden
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
neue-unternehmerkultur.de 🇩🇪
Neue Unternehmerkultur: zweite Chancen nach Scheitern
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
mutzuridee.com
Mut zur Idee - die Community für Ideen-Pioniere
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
northhessenaccelerate.de 🇩🇪
homepage_en – NHA-eV.de
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
fsiws.com
Food Startup Inkubator Weihenstephan – Unterstützung für Gründerinnen und Gründer
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
futureresearchlab.com
HEYNEW - Prototyping und Marktvalidierung
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
open-champion.de 🇩🇪
Open Champions - Startseite
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
open-champions.de 🇩🇪
Open Champions - Startseite
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
openchampion.de 🇩🇪
Open Champions - Startseite
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
openchampions.de 🇩🇪
Open Champions - Startseite
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
reandis.com
reandis - Venture Studio | Marken, Ideen und Unternehmen
1 shared topicsstartups
61match
businessangelbuch.com
Business Devils Buch -
1 shared topicsstartups
61match
open-door-day.de 🇩🇪
OPEN DOOR DAY 2019 im DZ.S
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.