Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to burnsoft.org

Welcome | BurnSoft.Net · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
burnsoft.net
Welcome | BurnSoft.Net
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
council-data.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome | Grav
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
builtapi.dev
Welcome | BuiltAPI Documentation
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
fundraiserapps.com
Welcome | We Build Mobile Apps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
oxarck.com
Welcome - Oxarck
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
banxiasoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome!
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
banxia-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome!
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
dea-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome!
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
dwsaas.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home | DW SaaS
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
8cell.com
Welcome to Buildbox
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
attheroot.dev
Home | At The Root
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
buildectron.com
Home | Buildectron
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
low-waste.com
Home | Independence Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
byjc.dev
Home | Software by JC
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
1welcome.com
1welcome | #1 Automation platform
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ninjalabs.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home | NinjaLabs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
calebhart.dev
Welcome to my Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
fyralabs.com
Welcome to Fyra Labs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.