Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to burnison.dev

Richard Burnison · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
simrichard.com
www.richardsim.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aswedeingermany.com
Michael Eriksson’s Homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
agdr.org
~ Austin G. Davis-Richardson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
burningmedia.net
BurningMedia
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lotalorafox.com
LotaloraFox
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
burritalks.io
🌯 Burritalks - Curated Tech Talks on DDD, Architecture, Agile & More
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buildnotburn.com
Build Not Burn
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abwesend.com
abwesend but alive
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
silverflowlines.com
Silver Flow Lines: Exploring Modern Web Development Trends
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bruits.org
Bruits
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
burton-krahn.com
Noel Burton-Krahn
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mugwhy.com
Mugwhy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pablosarabia.com
codeless.me
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
textlegend.com
Text Legend - Text Tools for Writers and Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ahmedqeshta.tech
Ahmed Qeshta - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lorenzobaronio.com
Code & Cables By Lorenzo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lowheap.com
Home - Lowheap
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewtruong.com
Notes and Code | notes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.