Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to burdsofafeatherpublishing.com

Burds of a Feather Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
adekonpublishing.com
Adekon – Publishing Company
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
acropolispublishing.com
Acropolis Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
redfame.com
Redfame Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
agorapublishingireland.com
Agora Publishing Ireland
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
aeonpublishing.net
Aeon Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
relevareglobal.com
Relevare Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
acrpublishing.com
ACR Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
aipublishinginternational.com
AI Publishing International
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
theaspirepublishers.com
Book Publishing Services
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
owithwings.com
O With Wings Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
ashmontpublishing.com
Ashmont Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
siriusnotions.com
Sirius Notions Press – A publishing company based in Falsity
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
ebookcph.com
Charotar Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
jubaeapublishing.com
Jubaea Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
ecmiss.com
ecmiss - Discover the Art of Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
5th-enigma.com
Arima Publishing-index
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
angrysheeppublishing.com
Angry Sheep Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
dexdigital.co.uk 🇬🇧
Dex Digital | Web Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.