Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to burchett.dev

Matt Burchett · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
that-matt.com
Matt Button
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewburch.me
Andrew Burch
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ashhatchett.com
Ash Hatchett
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
pairingwithrobots.com
Matt Briggs | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
buildnotburn.com
Build Not Burn
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
cachethq.io
Cachet
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
buchanansc.com
Scott Buchanan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
mpulver.com
Matt Pulver | CIO Who Still Ships
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simplabs.com
Mainmatter
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mterwill.com
Matt Terwilliger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewesherman.net
Andrew Sherman — Software engineering leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anirudhsshirahati.com
Anirudh S Shirahati
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cablespaghetti.dev
Cablespaghetti
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
a-mendes.com
MENDES DOS SANTOS Alexandre - Senior Software Engineer & SaaS Founder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
burz.net
Mr Burz
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buboreader.com
Bubo Reader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
futurehax.com
FutureHax - Full-Stack Developer & Technical Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
accelerateordie.com
Accelerate or Die | Matt Mireles | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.