Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bupe.dev

Home | Ben Lewis (@bupedev) · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
bwaldman.dev
About Me | Ben Waldman
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
asyncg.dev
Home | asyncg
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
atalariq.dev
Home | Atalariq
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mrmineev.com
Home | MrMineev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
overstated.dev
Home | Overstated
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
juliaaano.com
Home | Juliano Mohr
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juusohakala.com
Home | Juuso Hakala
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
lucasctl.com
Home | Lucas Vieira
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
julianhaeger.com
Home | Julian Haeger
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
fusekle223.com
Home | fusekle223.com
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
houdiniscode.com
HOME | Houdini's Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
thatdev.io
Home | ThatDev Shparki
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
cameronroberts.uk 🇬🇧
Home | Cameron Roberts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
atomizedobjects.com
Home | Atomized Objects
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abhinavsarkar.net
Home | abhinavsarkar.net
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abdelrahman-elkady.tech
Home | Abdelrahman Elkady
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ecodewithkaytee.com
Home | E Code With Kaytee
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paclinjanja.com
Home | Pacifique Linjanja
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.