similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bundaido.com

Japanese Language, Arts & Culture│文大堂大学 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

thegroupofeight.com

The Group of 8 – – The Japanese and Canadian Writers' Network

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

日本酒に溺れる大学生

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

fukuokabungakukan.com

福岡市文学館

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

無個性本棚　ひとやすみ | 無個性大学生の本と趣味

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

現代韓国朝鮮学会 | Association for Contemporary Korean Studies in Japan

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

学術文化協会

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

echizenbunkoudou.com

越前文光堂

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

藤野眞功の文庫

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

檜山哲彦文学館

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jsbmasamasa.com

医師の勧める時間がない現代人へ向けたブログ - 大学病院勤務外科系医師の発信するお役立ち情報

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

大和田光也全集

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ビーズログ文庫 | KADOKAWA

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jun-bungaku.com

初心者がおすすめする純文学 | おもしろいと思った本を純文学を中心に気ままに紹介していきます

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

buffalo-gym.com

永松大剛｜ナガマツダイゴウ｜Daigo Nagamatsu

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

だって小説が好きだから。 | 本をこんなに読むのに理由なんて無い！だって私は小説が、本が大好きだから。

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bunkasha-int.com

株式会社文化舎インターナショナル

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

文学教育研究者集団（略称:文教研）

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.