Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to bumpy.com

Bumpy Design - Book Design + Composition · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
dougturshen.com
Doug Turshen Book Design
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
alchemybookcovers.com
Alchemy Book Covers and Design
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
jingothecat.com
JingotheCat.com - Expert Book Design and Layout
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
ineedabookcover.com
Book Cover & Designers Directory | I Need a Book Cover
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
greeffiti.com
Home | Greeff-iti Designs
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
ajgbooks.com
ajgbooks – Stories of design
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
lesliekuo.com
Leslie Kuo | Bibliotheken, Gestaltung, Kommunikation // Libraries, design, communication
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
medeiroscreative.com
MedeirosCreative – Cover design services for the indie author
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
algowan.com
Al Gowan, Shared Vision: The Second American Bauhaus
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
alexiaepereira.com
Alexia e. Pereira
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
dot-font.com
dot-font by John D. Berry
2 shared topicsdesign
42match
ddepaolis.com
DePaolis Design - Brand & Design Company
1 shared topicsdesign
41match
nimdesign.com
nim design - nim design
1 shared topicsdesign
41match
indegodesign.com
Indego design - indego design
1 shared topicsdesign
40match
aoodesign.com
A&O Design - A&O Design
1 shared topicsdesign
40match
alexiabydesign.com
Alexia by Design | Design with Direction
1 shared topicsdesign
40match
jkdesignservices.com
JK Design Services - JK Design Services
1 shared topicsdesign
40match
fiamdesign.com
FIAMDESIGN - Senior Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.