Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bumbleendpublications.com

Home | Bumble End Publications · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
lpmaderaauthor.com
Waterbear Publications
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
butterflyfeetpublications.com
Butterfly Feet Publications
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
lorepublication.com
A Home For Original Fiction | Lore Publication
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
buffycram.com
Home | Buffy Cram
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
cratefires.com
HOME | Cratefires Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
abraham-hicks.com
Abraham-Hicks Publications - Law of Attraction Official Site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
acoldglow.com
Home | Buy A Cold Glow | Debut novel information
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
buckaroohearts.com
Home | Buckaroo Hearts
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bumpedhishead.com
Home | Bumped His Head Book
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
cozartcreations.com
Home | Carolyn Cozart Creations
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
fundeadbooks.com
FunDead Publications – We Publish the Strange and Unusual
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
junipernova.com
Home | Juniper Nova Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
bryndawolf.com
Home | Brynda Wolf
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
brynpottie.com
HOME | BRYN POTTIE
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
buchbuzz.com
Home | Buchbuzz - Buchbuzz
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
anngarvin.net
Home | Ann Garvin
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
byjbmpublishing.com
Home - BYJBM Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
juliancroft.com
Home - CroftCreations
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.