Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bulik.dev

Jonas Bulik · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
darodata.id 🇮🇩
PT Daro Data Teknologi
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
fullcourseyellow.com
Ferenc Balogh - Freelancer software developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
crafity.com
Crafity
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
lonkowski.com
Jens Lonkowski - Freelance software developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
atacan.dev
H. Atacan Oğul — H. Atacan Oğul
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
corzounai.com
Unai Corzo
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
furkancakici.com
Furkan Çakıcı | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
juliandolce.com
Julian Dolce
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
silassewell.com
Silas Sewell
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
silasdev.com
Silas Sewell
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
4fingers.dev
4fingers – Freelance Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
atess.dev
Emrah ATEŞ | Staff Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
teteewansoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Tete Ewan Software Java Developers
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
buckeye-software.com
Buckeye Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
siniteq.com
Siniteq | Remote Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
ozperez.com
Oz Perez — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
sugarrushsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Freelance Software Development | Sugar Rush Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
simongate.com
smgt
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.