similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bukyu.net

武久出版 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

図書出版南々社

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ユマニスム出版部

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

京阪奈情報教育出版

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

雀苺社 – 出版社：suzume_ichigo

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

鹿児島・奄美の本図書出版南方新社

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sutekibooks.com

ステキブックス -ステキを創る出版社-

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

naocoshibunko.com

名興文庫 | 良質な物語を多くの方にお届けする出版社

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ナナルイは図書館分類法の７類。芸術分野を指します。生活と芸術に関わる本を出版しています。

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

初めてのホームページ

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

curiouspursuit.net

Aim for polymath - 中途半端と武芸百般の間

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

池田貴将会員制度チェンジザワルードカレッジ CWC

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

debonairbase.digital

あなたの読書タイプ診断 | Contrast Pages - 東京・日本橋の書店

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

decadarystudio.digital

あなたの読書タイプ診断 | Contrast Pages - 東京・日本橋の書店

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dedede-denshi-syoseki.com

効率的・良コスパの電子書籍ライフのために│ででで電子書籍！どっとこむ

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

defacto-com.net

Š”Ž®‰ïŽÐƒfƒtƒ@ƒNƒgƒRƒ~ƒ…ƒjƒP�[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“ƒY

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1000man-road.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

僕、が言いたい1000のコト。 | 僕、のためのエッセイサイト。

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.