Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to builtbymichael.com

Michael | Indie Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
mrmichaelreed.com
Michael Reed
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
rebootafter40.com
Michael | AI Application Developer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
tesfaye.io
Michael Tesfaye
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
mpaglia.com
Michael Paglia | AI & Human Data
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
mtmatthews.com
Michael Matthews
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
juggernaut.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
rekommenda.com
Home page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
silenttech.org
Home page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
silogis.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
siosphere.com
Siosphere | Michael Kramer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mpilosov.com
Mathematical Michael
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
anirudhmani2005.com
Profile Page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
ozxmedia.com
OzX Media — Michael Osborne
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
recurringaiprofits.com
Squeeze page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
craymichael.com
Home | Zachariah Carmichael, Ph.D.
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mpatrickauthor.com
AI Ethics Books, Michael Patrick Author
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
creatingjudaism.com
Michael L. Satlow – Then and Now
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
theailist24.com
Home page - AI List24
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.