Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buildtek.app

BuildTek · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
60match
a-tech-group.com
A-Tech Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
60match
atillitum.com
Stige Senteret
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
60match
osngruppen.com
🚧 Områdesikring - NOS AS - Foldeport, Skyveport for industri 🚧
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
30match
bruktstillas.com
Bruktstillas – Brukt stillas og arbeidsutstyr
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
30match
bygg-3.com
BYGG-3 AS - Bygg-3 AS
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
30match
byggeutstyr.com
Hjem
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
30match
byggsjekk.com
Byggsjekk – AI-basert forhåndsvurdering av byggeprosjekter
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
30match
acroninfra.com
Acron Infra: Ansvar og kvalitet, hele veien. | Acron Infra
1 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
30match
cranenorway.com
Crane Norway | Nasjonal aktør innen løfteoperasjoner og transport
1 shared topicsmechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
30match
cranenorwayoslo.com
Crane Norway | Nasjonal aktør innen løfteoperasjoner og transport
1 shared topicsmechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
30match
cranenorwayost.com
Crane Norway | Nasjonal aktør innen løfteoperasjoner og transport
1 shared topicsmechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
30match
cranenorwaysor.com
Crane Norway | Nasjonal aktør innen løfteoperasjoner og transport
1 shared topicsmechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
30match
oslomarkiser.com
Nerligruppen – Totalleverandør av solskjerming til næringsbygg
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
30match
tegneservice.com
Vidars Tegneservice | Nybygg – Tilbygg – Byggesøknad
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.