similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to buildingthinkingclassrooms.com

Buildingthinkingclassrooms alternatives & similar sites

Building Thinking Classrooms | Teaching Practices for Enhancing Learning Mathematics — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
eamo-olympiad.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	EAMO \| East African Mathematical Olympiad	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
essexcountymathleague.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ECML – Mathematics competition for Essex County, NJ schools	en	secondary-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaylahart.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kayla Hart – Mathematics Tutor	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csalcharterschools.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CSAL - Community School for Apprenticeship Learning	United States~ en	secondary-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eoschools.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Personalized Learning for Student Success - EOSchools	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cslcharter.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home - Center for Student Learning Charter School at Pennsbury	en	secondary-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rethinkrelearnrepeat.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Rethink. Relearn. Repeat. – Curriculum. Teaching. Learning.	en	secondary-education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
himcm.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	COMAP: Mathematics Instructional Resources for Innovative Educators	en	secondary-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deeperlearning4all.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Deeper Learning – Preparing students for college, career, and life.	en	secondary-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
currenteventsweekly.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Current Events Weekly - A Social Studies Teaching Aid	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baystatelearning.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Bay State Learning Center \| Alternative Education for Teens	en	secondary-education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctylcenter.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CHISHOLM TRAIL YOUTH LEARNING CENTER - Home	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bigpicture.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Big Picture Learning \| One Student at a Time	en	education Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doug-j-jones.net ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Doug Jones's Mathematics Homepage	en	secondary-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
euniceray.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Eunice Ray \| A Teaching Portfolio	en	secondary-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brightermindslearning.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Brighter Minds Learning Co	en	secondary-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hs-guidetoteaching.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	A High School English Teacher’s Guide Series	en	education Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctlacademy.global ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CTL Academy Global – Personalized Learning everywhere and anywhere! Accredited School Program for 12+	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.