Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buildingfocus.dev

Sign in — Focus · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
thebadlist.com
Sign In — the bad list
2 shared topicsproductivity
67match
rebuildfocus.com
Rebuild — Focus Timer That Builds Your Room
2 shared topicsproductivity
67match
cosmicore.app
Cosmicore — Forge Your Focus. Build Your Universe.
2 shared topicsproductivity
67match
reblockapp.com
Reblock — Reclaim your focus.
2 shared topicsproductivity
67match
activatrr.com
Activatrr — Finish What You Start
2 shared topicsproductivity
66match
pandatimer.com
PandaTimer — Focus with Your Panda Companion
2 shared topicsproductivity
66match
regainapp.ai
Regain App — Avoid Distractions & Focus
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
homelifefocus.com
HomeLifeFocus
2 shared topicsproductivity
66match
mowaveone.com
MoWave One — Productivity, Focus and Organization in One Place
2 shared topicsproductivity
66match
oxirahub.com
Oxira Hub — Team Management
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
pageglides.com
The Task Keeper - Sign In
2 shared topicsproductivity
65match
relaywork.app
RelayWork — Work management for teams
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
eightyapp.ai
eighty - Focus on What Matters
2 shared topicsproductivity
65match
agendago.biz
AgendaGo — Meeting Management in 京都市
2 shared topicsproductivity
64match
hitask.com
Hitask - Easy Project and Task Management for Teams
2 shared topicsproductivity
64match
mozen.ai
Mozen — The Zettelkasten Workspace
2 shared topicsproductivity
64match
theautohitch.com
AutoHitch
2 shared topicsproductivity
64match
burnlist.app
burnlist.app — Daily todo list that burns at midnight
2 shared topicsproductivity

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.