Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buhtasource.com

Sign in to your account · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
buildkite-ghe.com
GitHub · Enterprise
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
loscwy.com
loscwy · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
cortari.com
Cortari · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
agileos.net
agileos · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
pakapaca.dev
rpaka-farm · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
redrzr.com
redrzr (redrzr) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
akshchand.com
akshchand (Aksh) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
asyncant.com
asyncant · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
edaptivesaas.co.uk 🇬🇧
Sign in · GitLab
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
longbeardstudios.com
Longbeard Studios · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
sirung.com
Sign in · GitLab
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
efreak.dev
efreak-dev (efreak) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
hokodi.com
Hoko Data Insights · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
lpmanansala.com
lpmanansala (Lester) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewhall.dev
andrewhall (Andrew Hall) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
efemeralbit.com
ephemeralbit (Felix Wyss) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
efemeralbits.com
ephemeralbit (Felix Wyss) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
atomsproject.com
Atom's Project · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.