Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bugswriter.com

bugswriter's website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
muhammedalidogan.com
Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
mshamir.com
Shamir's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
crachel.com
crachel | Personal website of Craig Rachel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
reeswrites.com
rees's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
reidswan.com
Reid Swan – Reid's personal website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
simartin.dev
Simon Martin's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
remidurand.com
Rémi DURAND - Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
c2vi.dev
c2vi's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
mtnkenney.com
Matt Kenney | Matt’s personal website.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewkesler.net
Andrew Kesler's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
home-planets.com
Home Planets . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ – My personal websites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
jslenis.com
Jeffry Lenis Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
calebsharp.dev
caleb's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
simonwoodtli.com
Simon's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
julianloiacono.com
Julian's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
redinzide.com
RedInzide website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
ludusamo.com
Brendan's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
alankay.net
Alan Kay's Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.