Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bugrahan.me

Home – Buğrahan Kök · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
moxiebytes.com
Home – Moxiebytes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
asuarez.dev
Home – Albert Suarez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
k2softwarestudio.com
Home — K2
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
hkturan.com
Hasan Kaan TURAN
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
loovery.dev
loovery.dev — Indie apps & the stories behind them
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexandervanderwerff.com
Home — Alexander van der Werff
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
cpusoftware.com
Home — CPU Software & Consulting
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
rotunda-systems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home Page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
crane.dev
Home - crane
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
luigidonadel.com
Home | Luigi Donadel
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ovixa.io
Home | OVIXA
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
buildsharerepeat.com
Build Share Repeat – Building complex software in public.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abqcampbells.com
Home • Roger Campbell
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aboutkumar.com
Home - About Kumar
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
buildnerds.com
Home - buildNerds
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
luarnol.com
Home | Luarnol
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
signalive.io
Home Page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrewlubinger.dev
Home - Andrew Lubinger
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.