Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bugleev.com

Bugleev.com: Personal Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
simeon-dodov.com
Simeon Dodov - Portfolio - Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
signalpagesites.com
Signal Page
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
4dmediatv.com
Argir Popov | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
atminhaj.com
Personal Site
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
alexdametto.dev
Alex Dametto | Personal Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
burrowsly.com
Burrowsly | Website Development with a personal touch.
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
simon-currie.com
Simon Currie Developer Portfolio Personal Blog
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
musaozkan.dev
Musa Özkan - Personal Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
hmitev.com
hmitev.com – Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
lukovskii.com
LUKOVSKii - Personal Webpage
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
aaronmotacek.dev
Aaron | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
reloadtheweb.com
Reload The Web | My Personal Home Page
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
abdullahshzd01.com
Abdullah Shahzad - Personal portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
reecefarrell.com
Home | Reece Farrell Personal Porfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
justinminaya.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
justinjrdev.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
justinjrminaya.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
muhfauziazhar.com
Personal Website | Muhammad Fauzi Azhar
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.