Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bugarin.dev

bugarin · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
bukno.com
indentit
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
angelleleger.net
Angelle Leger - Angelle Leger
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
0xeb.net
Shortjump! | Reversing engineering, programming and what not…
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
sioncodes.com
SionCodes.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
egisca.com
Egisca – Software Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
aaccurso.me
Alan Accurso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewsturman.com
Andrew Sturman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mtfelisb.com
mtfelisb - mtfelisb
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
refactorers-journal.com
Refactorer's Journal
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
camerondoyle.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Doyle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andybitz.io
hello ^•^/
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lonepairlearning.com
zaccrites.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
brunorb.com
Structure and Interpretation of Bruno's Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ashfaqrahman.com
Ashfaq Rahman
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ebersole.dev
Luke Ebersole
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
eclecticcoding.com
Eclectic Coding | Chuck Smith — Senior Rails Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
eclecticsaddlebag.com
Eclectic Coding | Chuck Smith — Senior Rails Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.