Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bugarela.com

About me · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
ebvdesigns.com
About Me
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
jvm-lukas.com
Blog about JVM ☕
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
julianaoconnor.com
About Me - Juli O’Connor
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
hitchdev.com
About - HitchDev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
hitchtest.com
About - HitchDev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
butenoughaboutyou.com
But enough about you…
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
hoepelman.dev
dhoepelman.github.io | Hoepelman.dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
1riz.com
Projects | 1riz
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
buanasalf.com
Buanasalf
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bytedream.dev
home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
luasoftware.com
Lua Software - maker, builder, dreamer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ozayed.dev
Home | Omar Zayed
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alfonsoce11.dev
Alfonso Espino
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
thanasispetsas.com
Home | Thanasis Petsas
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
cosycoding.com
Cosycoding | I write about my journey as software developer.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bynilo.com
Nilo - Polyglot Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
mrcoles.com
Peter Coles - mostly writing about software… mostly
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
muteealjabri.com
Mutee Aljabri
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.