Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bug-hunting.com

Bug Hunting Ltd · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
testingliveview.com
Testing LiveView
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
fuckingstatuscodes.com
Fucking Status Codes
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
muhaiman.dev
home | devsafar
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
testingrailsbook.com
Books - Testing Rails
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
angularrecipes.dev
Modern Frontend Development using Angular, Web Architecture & TypeScript Patterns | Angular Recipes
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
oxleyprogramming.com
Richard Oxley | Programming Consulting
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
redlem.com
GETTING STARTED WITH BRACKETS
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
7ix.net
7IX - Love internet technology
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
abap.me
Abap&me
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
acceleraterun.digital
AccelerateRun — Runtime Optimization for JavaScript Developers
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
coyotelogic.com
Coyote Logic
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
jstodev.com
JStoDev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
angular-spring.com
Angular Spring Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
abdesol.me
Abdella Solomon
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
bryceohmer.com
Bryce Ohmer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
budiadiono.com
Coding Notes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
hmagdy.com
HMagdy.com - Hassan Magdy Saad (HMagdy) | Crazy Web Developer :D
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
holgerscode.com
Holger's Code — Software Development, Training & Consulting
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.