similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bufab.com.pl

Bufab alternatives & similar sites

Bufab to Twój partner w łańcuchu dostaw elementów złącznych i C-parts — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Logistics And Transportation Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
elgum.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Elgum \| Taśmy przenośnikowe, urządzenia NO, ramiona załadunkowe	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vistulaoffshore.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Poznaj Nas - Vistula offshore	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
sreniawski.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Worki na zwłoki- Producent worków do transportu zwłok	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbinfrastruktura.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	MB Infrastruktura Sp. z o.o. - zarządzanie oraz udostępnianie linii kolejowej	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
btrustup.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	BtrustUP.eu - weryfikacja podwykonawców w transporcie drogowym	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weasels.co ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Weasels Sp. z o.o. — Transport krajowy i międzynarodowy	Colombia pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
baron-transport.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Strona Główna	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 14
4magazin.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	4MAGAZIN Robert Chyczewski Co.	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
api4ship.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Site is underconstruction	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dapatrans.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	O Firmie	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry Joomla Ubercart	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fargo-international.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Fargo International \|	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaspolab.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Kaspo Lab Sp. z o.o. – Najszerszy zakres akredytacji w Polsce	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mcg-pharma.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	MCG PHARMA – Controlled temperature transport	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mda-project.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	MDA Project — Digital Fabric of Transport	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
remio-mw.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Remio M. W.	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omegaserwis.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Omega Serwis – Twój Partner w Biznesie	pl	logistics-and-transportation-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omida-group.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	OMIDA Group \| Integrator Logistyczny	pl	logistics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
squeaky-mount.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Squeaky Mount Logistics – Nowoczesna transportowa logistyka	pl	logistics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.