Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buddysgroup.com

Buddy's Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
lucasgroupsearch.com
Lucas Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
71match
lucascareers.com
Lucas Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
71match
lucasgroupinsights.com
Lucas Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
71match
lucasgroup.com
Lucas Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
jrphillips.com
Phillips Group Inc.
2 shared topicsbusiness
67match
atrotusgroup.com
Home - Atrotus Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
accesspartnersgroup.com
Access Partners Group
2 shared topicsbusiness
65match
247staff.com
247 Group – 247 Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
65match
3phl.com
3PL – nGROUP
2 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
adoregroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome To Adore - Adore Group
2 shared topicsbusiness
63match
acrogov.com
AGSG Home page - AGSG | Acro Government Solutions Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
63match
3spglobal.com
3SP Global | Boundless Growth
2 shared topicshuman-resources
63match
eflr.com
EFLR Group — Experiment. Fail. Learn. Repeat.
2 shared topicshuman-resources
63match
eflrgroup.com
EFLR Group — Experiment. Fail. Learn. Repeat.
2 shared topicshuman-resources
63match
msibgtest.com
MSI Benefits Group Test Site | People Focused. Technology Empowered.
2 shared topicsbusiness
62match
recspand.com
Home - Recspand
2 shared topicshuman-resources
62match
recruitingmarketers.com
Recruiting Talent Group | Recruiting, Hiring, and Talent Sourcing
2 shared topicshuman-resources
62match
accelerim.com
Accelerim — Your Trusted Partner in Business Growth
2 shared topicshuman-resources

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.