similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to buddho.dev

Sajid Rahman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Teles’s Blog | Security Research

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Emily Astranova

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

silascutler.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

andygreenphd.com

Andy Green, Ph.D. – Information Security Educator and Researcher

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

furkanakinalp.com

Furkan Akınalp

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

#9sg security team • website

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Jan-Willem H. Bullee - Interested in cybercrime and cyber security research.

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

0xeb_bp | a security blog

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

pajtimsecurity.dev

Pajtim Security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

angel-alvarez.dev

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

abdulrahman-almuqrn.com

Abdulrahman Almuqrn

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

zeroframe // ANTIREPLAY

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.