Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buda.dev

Kristi Buda · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
juliekristen.com
Julie Kristen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
terrisastra.com
TerrisAstra
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
jtolushola.com
Olushola Temiloluwa
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
atmilios.com
Aristides
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
0xdesigner.com
0xDesigner
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
aabhaskrjha.com
Aabhas Kr Jha - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
simonvermeir.com
Simon Vermeir
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
budaev.info
Sergey Budaev
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
futuristic-art.com
FuturisticArt
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
atomiccto.com
AtomicCTO
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
abouhashish.com
Ibrahim Abouhashish
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ashwinprakashkadayil.com
KAASPR – AI applied on Automotive SW Engineering
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
junhoyoon.com
Jun Ho Yoon Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
recurship.com
karachiwala.dev - Mashhood Rastgar - ramblings of a engineering leader based in Karachi sharing about tech and startups.
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
sitec-sicherheitstechnik.com
Max Meuer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
theaibusinesscorp.com
The AI Business
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
theaibusinessinc.com
The AI Business
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ekiyor.dev
Ekiyor Odoko — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.