Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to buck.software

Buck Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
fs-results.com
Fast Software
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
77match
absw.io
AB Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
6gl.io
6GL Software Inc.
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
76match
3root.com
3Root — Software & AI
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
abstractsoftware.io
Abstract Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
relaxsoftwareapps.com
Relax Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
snowcreeksoftware.com
Snow Creek Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
smritisoft.com
Smriti Software Solutions
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
msoftwaresolutions.ai
M GEN SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
smithstreetsoftware.com
Smith Street Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
adevix.net
Adevix | Software & AI Solutions
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
mowat.dev
Jacob Mowat - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
advelta.net
Advelta - The software innovation partner.
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
jugglesoft.com
JuggleSoft - We Build Software
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
smagnettech.com
Smagnet | Software
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
ehwangah.com
devvor - software engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
reguminds.com
Atlas Software & AI Consulting
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
bttrb.com
Better Best Software Solutions
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.