Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bubulkaanalytics.com

Michael Bubulka - Analytics & Data Science Projects · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ejdataworks.com
Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
70match
panorama.com
Panorama - BI & Data Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
70match
adssrn.org
Africa Data Science and Statistics Research Network
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
munezahwaqar.com
Munezah Waqar | Data Analytics Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
anhuynh.org
An Huynh · Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
cpoint5.com
CPoint5 - Data Analytics Company
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
junho-eum-datascience.com
JUNHOEUM Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
craveanal.com
ANAL - Zero Bullshit Analytics by COSMIQ
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
ashrike.tech
Ashish Kumar | Data Science Enthusiast
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
ejasare.com
Eric Asare — Data Analyst & Business Analytics Student
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
achrafmansari.com
Achraf Mansari | Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
owenmiddleton.com
Owen Middleton | Data Analyst
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
abishekthapa.com
Abishek Thapa - Data Analyst Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
juvaana.com
Juvaana - Tanzania's Premier Data Science Platform
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
accioanalytics.com
Accio Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
munawwaranwar.com
Muhammad Munawwar Anwar | Data Analyst
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
sigridwei.com
Sigrid Wei | Data & Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
alexspigler.dev
Alex Spigler — Statistics & Computer Science
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.