Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bubbleeyespublishing.com

Bubble Eyes Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
1kfaces.com
Thousand Faces Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
terrytoler.com
BeHoldings Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
bullybookspublishing.com
Bully Books Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
bullpenpublishing.com
Bullpen Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
cratefires.com
HOME | Cratefires Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
atheisttales.com
Epic Saga Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
lourhousepublishing.com
Lour House Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
alexparkerpublishing.com
Alex Parker Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
juliemahoney.com
Julie Mahoney's Publishings
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
byjbmpublishing.com
Home - BYJBM Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
efacepublishing.com
Home - eFace Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
2ning.net
The Great Bear & Pleiades Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
busybeemedia.org
Busy Bee Media – Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
junipernova.com
Home | Juniper Nova Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
andthenwhathappened.net
And Then What Happened Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
5sisterspress.com
5 Sisters Press | Publishing Great Stories
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bunyapublishing.com
Bunya Publishing – Gary Taaffe's Publishing Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
mpublishinghouse.com
mpublishinghouse — Independent Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.