Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bryanmoore.io

Bryan Moore - Tech Lead · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
simonpihler.com
Simon Pihler - Tech Lead & Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
hmvtechgroup.com
HMV - Tech Group
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
tessstudios.com
Home - TESS Technologies
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
jsmdigital.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home | Jon Moore
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
bryanyi.com
Bryan Yi
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
coxcore.com
COXCORE - TagWire
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mpumelelomkhize.com
Mpumelelo Mkhize - Tech Translator
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
thealik.com
Ali K | Senior Software Engineer & Tech Lead
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
bryanmylee.com
Bryan Lee
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
jvega.dev
Jaime Vega - Front-end Engineer & Tech Lead
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
niotech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Niotech - Tech That Matters
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
butechbd.com
BU Tech BD
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mpenate.com
Mario Peñate - Tech Lead & Full Stack Engineer | React, Node.js, TypeScript
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
buildswithabid.com
Abid Hussain - Tech Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
frootsnoops.com
Frootsnoops Home - Full Stack Software Engineer & Tech Lead
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewmoore.dev
Andrew Moore
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
mrtechdev.com
MR. TECH DEV
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
luizbueno.com
Luiz Bueno — Senior Frontend Developer & Tech Lead
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.