Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brunosalcedo.com

Bruno — Research · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
3gence.org
3gence Research Group
1 shared topicseconomy
70match
abigaildow.com
Abigail Dow — Home
1 shared topicseconomy
69match
regional-economics.com
Regional Economics Research Cluster
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
econo-my.com
econo-my economics research on the web
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
signalcoreanalytics.com
SignalCore Analytics LLC - Data-Driven Research
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
aces-research.com
ACES-Research, LLC
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
econaneesharora.com
Aneesh Arora | Economist, Data Scientist, Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
adrienmatray.net
Adrien Matray – Economist, Scholar & Policy Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
acccimserc.com
Socio Economic Research Centre Malaysia | SERC Malaysia
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
akshayshanker.net
Akshay Shanker | Research Fellow, UNSW, Sydney
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
bruno-calderon.com
Bruno Calderón Hernández
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
econolicyafrica.com
Econolicy Africa | Economic Journalism and Research
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
econmeet.com
Jaimie W. Lien - Professor | Center for Economic Research | Jaimie W. Lien
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
brunotheodosio.com
Prof. Bruno Theodosio, Ph.D.
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
econterms.com
Online Glossary of Research Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
louissears.com
Louis Sears – Natural Resource Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
c-dep.org
Center for Digital Economy Policy | AI, Telecom, Trade & Research
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
mugesuer.com
Müge Süer — Postdoctoral Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.