Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brungas.com

Brungas Consulting · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
bshconsulting.com
BSH Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
79match
4ls-consulting.com
4LS Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
79match
nicolasconsulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
Nicolas Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
accelva.com
Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
lu-byz-consulting.com
LU-Byz Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
ls3consulting.com
LS3 Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
cj-consulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
CJ Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
abrcon.com
ABR Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
ebgconsulting.com
EBG Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
msconsulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
MS Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
5pconsulting.biz
5P Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
5pconsulting.com
5P Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
terra-consulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
Terra Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
ecsconsulting.com
ECS Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
eddams.com
Eddams Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
nibconsulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
Nib Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
a08consulting.com
A08 Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
acies-consulting.com
Acies Consulting
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.