Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brugnara.dev

Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
61match
a3di.dev
Aaron Wise | A3DI
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
holonnexus.com
HolonNexus — Semantic Architecture Platform
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
silzila.com
Silzila
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
building-data-products.com
Building Data Products
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
bugiadata.com
BugiaData | Relational Fake Data API & Synthetic Data Generator
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
juanalytics.com
juanalytics - Juan Manuel Perafan
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
testdatacraft.com
TestDataCraft - Free Test Data Generator | JSON, CSV, SQL Export
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
adamfowler.org
Adam's Deep Technology Blog – It's all about the tech
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
5bulletdata.com
5-Bullet Data | Dev Bhosale | Substack
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
aboutliorabraham.com
Lior Abraham
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
nexteam.co.uk 🇬🇧
Nexteam - Technology, Experience, Delivered.
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
buildersdao.tech
Graph BuildersDAO
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
calebkirsch.com
Hi, I’m Caleb. – Caleb Kirsch
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
angelobovino.me
Angelo Bovino
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
andyliang.dev
Andy Liang
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
aaronyan.me
Aaron Yan - data scientist.
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
abcum.tech
Abcum
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
0xfd.com
0xfd – …
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.