Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brucealexandercook.com

Bruce Alexander Cook · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
galexanderstone.com
G. Alexander Stone
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
jralexanderauthor.com
JR Alexander – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
alexanderjcolemanauthor.com
Alexander J Coleman Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alexandermccallsmith.com
Homepage - Alexander McCall Smith
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
juliadalexander.com
JuliaDAlexander | WiP: Writer in Progress
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
brucemadole.com
Bruce Madole
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
thechromaticprotocol.com
The Chromatic Protocol — Wesley K. Alexander
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
alexandrasimonecalvin.com
Alexandra Simone Calvin
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
bruceastewart.com
Home - BRUCE A. STEWART
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
bruceholsinger.com
Bruce Holsinger
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
alexandratarmstrong.com
Home - Author Alexandra T. Armstrong
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
brucepweinberg.com
Bruce P Weinberg
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
alexandraammonparthun.com
Alexandra Ammon Parthun - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
bruceborgos.com
Author Bruce Borgos
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
brucemacbain.com
Author Bruce Macbain
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
alexandriafaulkenbury.com
Alexandria Faulkenbury – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
alexandriadeverouxofficialpage.com
Alexandria DeVeroux Official Page
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
alexanderhammil.net
Alexander Hammil – tiny little stories about reprehensible people
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.