similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bronzesim.com

Bronzesim alternatives & similar sites

GitHub - barbalet/bronzesim: Stand-alone C simulation of an Early Bronze Age–style island world · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dapiwrapper.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	GitHub - rcconsulting/myFMApiLibrary-for-PHP: A wrapper in PHP to use the FileMakerRestDataAPI · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programmer.web.id ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Programmer - World of Programmer	Indonesia en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csalgorithm.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Implementation of algorithms in C#	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
srikanthkommineni.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Tech Musings \| Collection of random tech discussions	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howtopython.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	How To Python - Explore the World of Python Programming	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
githut.info ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	GitHut - Programming Languages and GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brunorb.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Structure and Interpretation of Bruno's Code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danxexe.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	danxexe’s blog \| a collection of mad ramblings about software development	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
familyeckstein.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	hello-world \| This repository is for practicing the GitHub Flow.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cstml.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	~/cstml.dev \| A blog like a sketchbook to keep track of my ideas, findings, and learnings. Suggestions via PRs @github or DM me on twitter.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dariawan.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Java, Spring, Web Application and Microservices tutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharp-station.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Tutorials, Links and Articles About C# \| C# Station	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erbsland.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Erbsland DEV	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vishalgulati.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Vishal Gulati	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
visualizards.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Visualizards \| We write about Python, data visualisation and anything else we find interesting.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
everybodycodenow.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Everybody Code Now! \| Empowering the Next Generation of Leaders in Computing	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
virtualjug.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	vJUG - The World's First Virtual Java User Group	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apidock.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Ruby & Rails API Documentation - APIdock	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.