similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bridgedproject.com

Bridgedproject alternatives & similar sites

BridgED | Disability Awareness — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Special Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
resolutionsmaine.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Re:Solutions Educational Advocacy Services \| Advocacy for children, youth, and young adults who are disabled physically, emotionally or mentally.	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hubbardisd.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Hubbard Independent School District - Home	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brighterfutureedu.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Brighter Future \| Educational Diagnostic Services & Consulting	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaystahl.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home • Kay Stahl EdD \| Reading, Literacy, Consultant	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annhcolorado.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Teaching for Talent – Supporting Teachers and Parents to Challenge Their Gifted Students	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
squarevale.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Centre for Educational Neuroscience \| University College London – Birkbeck University of London – UCL Institute of Education	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boomlearning.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Boom Cards by Boom Learning	en	special-education HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
hcpss.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	HCPSS	United States~ en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hindmanathome.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Hindman Settlement School: At Home Tutoring	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
htag.io ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	HTAG	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
eastersealsopts.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Easterseals Arkansas: Outreach Program & Technology Services – Equipping the educators of today with the teaching tools of tomorrow.	en	special-education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cshassoc.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Colorado Speech-Language-Hearing Association – Colorado Speech-Language-Hearing Association	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ctserc.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home - State Education Resource Center	en	education Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctserc.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home - State Education Resource Center	en	education Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
customizedinterventions.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Sandy Rizzo \| Customized Interventions	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
customizedinterventions.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Sandy Rizzo \| Customized Interventions	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddmn.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home - Decoding Dyslexia Minnesota	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debstutoring.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Deborah's Tutoring Services - Embrace Your Potential	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.