Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brandoncrooks.com

Brandon Crooks — Senior Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
luanbr.com
Luan — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
loridyer.com
Lori Dyer — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
terrenceokafor.com
Terrence Okafor — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
luchoaranceta.com
Lucho Aranceta — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
ashishkhoshya.com
Ashish Khoshya — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
brucevang.com
Bruce Vang | Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
juliascucuglia.com
Júlia Scucuglia — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
andymovespixels.com
Andy Chu — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
courtneyeisenhuth.com
Courtney Eisenhuth — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
ani-mccurnin.com
Ani McCurnin - Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
paavanpatel.com
Paavan - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
adamlowrydesign.com
Adam Lowry — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
andrewtang.net
Andrew Tang — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
alexpwindsor.com
Alex Windsor — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
lucianrus.com
Senior Product Designer | Homepage
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
jtremain.com
Jason Cross | Senior Product Designer Portfolio (UX/UI)
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
lrooney.com
Lesley Rooney — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
anotherandywong.com
Andy Wong — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.