Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brandonaston.com

Brandon Aston | Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
brandonwie.dev
Brandon Wie | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
brandonleetran.com
Brandon Lee Tran - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
brandonyee.io
Brandon Yee
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
matthowell.com
Matt Howell | Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
brandonpoe.dev
Home - Brandon Poe - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ksorv.com
Saurav Kumar | Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
brandonguigo.com
Brandon GUIGO
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
grindengineer.com
Grind Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
boringengineer.com
Boring Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andrewkayvanfar.com
Andrew Kayvanfar | Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
sspiv.com
SSPIV – Learn | Engineer | Hack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
7pm.dev
7pm.dev | Engineering Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
boosteng.com
Boost Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
brandonwoz.com
Brandon Woz
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
brandonrlee.com
Brandon Lee
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
brock-eng.com
Brock Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
fanniebarskhian.com
Fannie Barskhian | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
thepixelengineer.com
The Pixel Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.