Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brandonargel.com

Brandon Argel · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
aldr.io
Brandon Aldrich
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
adityaadhikari.tech
Aditya Adhikari - I build things for the web.
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
reevan.dev
Reevan Mobile & Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anggita.org
Joseph Joshua Anggita | Full-stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
athikhasan.com
Developers Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
abijahrgang.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
thataiwebguy.com
Brandon Diehl | The AI Web Guy
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
eddiemoger.com
Eddie Moger | Senior Software Engineer & AI Systems Architect
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
thaerhendawi.com
Thaer Hendawi's Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
louttchenko.com
Alex Louttchenko - Fullstack Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
alexmj212.dev
Alex Johnson - Senior Front-End Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
abozaidx.dev
Ahmed Abozaid | Software Engineer & Creative Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anmolsingh.me
Anmol Pratap Singh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
luminyde.com
Luminyde | Premium Web Development & Branding Agency
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewtsao.net
Andrew Tsao
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
juanluisfg.com
Juan Luis Flores | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
regenkomet.dev
regenkomet.dev — Modern Web Engineering
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.