Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brandonarchbold.com

About Me | Brandon Archbold · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
benjaminbrandt.com
Ben Brandt
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
benwc.dev
Ben Warwick-Champion
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
ariannastory.com
Arianna Story
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
matteocadoni.com
Matteo Cadoni
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
roberthargreaves.com
Robert Hargreaves
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
rocksolidwebdesign.com
Devkeen
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
abdelrhmansafwat.com
Abdelrhman Safwat
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
roozbehsam.com
Roozbeh Sam
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
arpanlaha.com
Arpan Laha
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
roblao.com
A software engineer's blog by Rob Lao
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
softwareengineeringstandard.com
SES - Software Engineering Standard
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
robbiemackay.com
This week #7 – Robbie Mackay
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
nguyentom.com
Tom Nguyen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
benjaminward.com
Benjamin Ward
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
massfords.com
Mark Ford – Software Engineer in the Greater Boston Area
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
bobvarioa.com
About Me
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
arjunjuneja.com
arjun juneja
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
felix-seifert.com
About Me – Felix Seifert
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.