Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to brandonaltermatt.com

Brandon Altermatt Personal Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
atharvatijare.com
Atharva Tijare | Personal Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
andrewtbiehl.com
Andrew T. Biehl | Welcome to my personal website!
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
75match
atbrakhi.com
Personal website
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
andrewddufresne.com
Andrew Dufresne Personal Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
hizirozcelik.com
Hizir Ozcelik | Personal website
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
juanccalberto.com
Juan's website
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
panagiotis.dev
<Portfolio type="personal" />
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
jwtries.com
Junwoo Choi's Personal Webpage
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
budhajeewa.com
Supun Budhajeewa – Personal Website of Supun Budhajeewa
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
angeldav.net
Angel's Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
ehartung.com
Elizabeth Hartung
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
alfonsorincon.dev
Alfonso Rincon - Portafolio Personal
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
2kcode.net
2kcode
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andyzhang.dev
Andy Zhang
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
atalhaerkul.com
Erkul
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
silvalima.dev
Miguel Silva
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewcoder.dev
Portfolio | Andrew Nicholson
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aaronmramirez.dev
Portfolio - Aaron Ramirez
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.